Although this reading was fairly long and a little
complicated, I can say that I understood it and definitely liked it. I get what
Bradley is saying when it comes to classifying such different types of reading
into the same category. But I disagree with him in the sense where it seems as
if he thinks it’s a bad thing. It came off to me that Bradley sided with the
idea of actual novels and memoirs rather than using comic strips to explain one’s
life. I admit to say I can definitely be wrong but it felt like he didn’t think
comic strips could serve as the same purpose, and that they were more useful
for funny stories or jokes. However, I believe they can be used for just as
strong as a purpose that novels and memoirs go far. When it comes to writing, I
think of it as a form of art. And when it comes to art, there is no one
specific way to express it. Every single person has a unique way that applies
to them as an individual. So if someone wanted to express their life
experiences through comic strips, why not? It’s true that everyone has their
opinions but no one should be limited to have to express yourself “by the rules.”
If Bradley doesn’t agree with it, then he can stick to his type of writing
while letting others write the way they want too. Even though I didn’t agree
with everything Bradley stated, I can definitely say that he addressed great
points in his text that can start up strong feelings about the different types
of writing.
Seher,
ReplyDeleteI like your view on how comic strips can serve a purpose the same way novels and memoirs can. It is true that it's a form of art and there isn't any guidelines on how to express it.
Heay Seher,
ReplyDeleteI feel as if Bradley was down playing the importance of comics and stories that we have read in class. I absolutely agree with you, I think comics can serve as intellectual and useful readings.